plumtreeblossom: (sayuri)
[personal profile] plumtreeblossom
[Poll #690264]

I realized that almost everyone considers both factors to some degree. But I'm interested in seeing to which side more people lean, which is why I didn't put a "Both Equal" option. Choose whichever is of more importance to you, and feel free to discuss.

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 07:10 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] plumtreeblossom.livejournal.com
Yeah, my thinking on that question was centered more regionally, as opposed to globally. So no worries about dream houses in Siberia! But what if it were in, say, rural central Maine?

(no subject)

Date: 2006-03-13 07:55 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wellstar.livejournal.com
Same thing, I think. I wouldn't be looking at houses in rural central Maine unless I had a good reason to be there in the first place. (Job, family, significant other with a stronger need to be there than I had need to NOT be there.)

But if you're asking would I move there just for a piece of property? No way. (Okay, maybe as a summer home... ;) she says, laughing at her bank account.) Same with any undesireable location [ultra-conservative small town, neighborhood where I didn't feel safe, etc.]. I agree with [livejournal.com profile] istemi about the false dichotomy, and also with your comparison between home-buying and dating above. I was going to say in my first comment that making any large investment (financial, emotional, physical, temporal, whatever) has got to be a good balance between getting more out of it than you put in, and actually caring about/enjoying what you're doing/where you are. This applies to dating, jobs, family, living situations, post-secondary school, and so much more.

Profile

plumtreeblossom: (Default)
plumtreeblossom

September 2017

S M T W T F S
     12
3 456789
10111213141516
17181920212223
24252627282930

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags