Not A Good Fit....
Mar. 21st, 2006 06:51 amI don't want to go on the interview my headhunter is sending me to tomorrow. I realize that it pays 150% of my current salary, but I don't like the industry, and I don't like the tone of the prep material I've been sent. It smacks of cut-throat culture and no room for humanity. I wouldn't be happy there, and wouldn't last 6 month, I know from experience. I can do soft-corporate, but not hard-corporate (I just made those terms up to fit my immediate word need. You know what I mean by them, though.) Also, Headhuntress says it will be at least a 3-hour interview, probably longer. I think that's excessive for a 1st interview. And, they'd reject me as soon as they Googled my bohemian ass, no question.
My only motivation is the $money$, but a fat paycheck isn't going to make me happy in a work climate I hate. I think I'm passing on this one.
My only motivation is the $money$, but a fat paycheck isn't going to make me happy in a work climate I hate. I think I'm passing on this one.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 01:36 pm (UTC)ftr, i don't think 3h is long for a first interview. at my company, we tend to have a 15-30min phone interview, then a long (3-5h) in person interview. and we give them lunch, so maybe you'll get that too. :)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 02:07 pm (UTC)Stop worrying about actually landing this job. Use this for what you need, which is the experience of feeling in control, of knowing what you want and don't want.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 03:16 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 04:15 pm (UTC)Unless you lie or withold information on what it is you are really looking for, your headhunter won't ever "throw" you away. They want to find you a really good fit, by telling them exactly what you are looking for, they can help refine that list - that's what you are paying them for (in the end, they are getting money because of you getting hired).
I speak as a former headhunter myself (and a damn good one, if I do say so myself - I have references). If your headhunter knows what you are looking for and is sending you anyway, you might be a foil for another candidate they are proposing.
And if your headhunter kicks you to the curb...call me, I have plenty of friends still in the business.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 12:27 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 03:09 pm (UTC)For instance, i had a candidate that was a Desktop Specialist, he was looking for an environment where he could be mentored and there was room for advancement. He was interested in money, but the environement was really going to be a large factor in his decision. Training opportunities would mean a lot to him. I ended up placing him at Harvard Business School where the pay wasn't as good as State Street, but the other opportunities more than made up for what he wanted. His resume was solid, his experience fit right in, he would have been "right" in a number of places but I knew the people involved had created their own "corner" of the world where he would feel comfortable fitting in and THAT would make him a "shoe in".
The clearer you are on what you want, the clearer it can be to place you when the right opportunity presents itself. THAT is what the headhunter needs. You need to be clear, concise and memorable with a positive attitude.
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 03:07 pm (UTC)Checking out your ass...
Date: 2006-03-21 05:02 pm (UTC)(Though I do wonder about the dark doings mentioned in the Salon article...)
If you had the time, I'd say do the interview. And I agree with Jo; a headhunter may pressure you to take a position, but ultimately you're well within your rights to say no and any headhunter who feels differently probably isn't working in your best interest to begin with. (I never worked as one but I swam with one of the great whites of the business for ten years; he was most definitely a shark and you never trusted him, but most of the time, he was *your* shark.)
(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-21 11:11 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 12:09 am (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 04:03 pm (UTC)(no subject)
Date: 2006-03-22 10:49 pm (UTC)