One Plate Wonder
Feb. 5th, 2006 12:14 pmI've come to the conclusion, after a recent string of good but largely unfinished restaurant meals, that I do not like the course-by-course dining template. Naturally, this is the only available template for most cuisines of the world.
The reason is that I fill up pretty quickly. Too quickly to still be interested in more food after I've finished the soup and salad. Add an appetizer to that, and you can just forget it. I'll be unable to do more than taste one bite of the most important part of the meal -- entree and dessert.
Also I think course-by-course encourages overeating, particularly with ginormous American portions and short mealtimes, because people feel obligated to continue eating even after they're stuffed, to get to "the good part." I've kept my weight in check all these years with portion control. No, I don't weigh food or measure, but I can eyeball something and know whether it's all going to fit inside or not. It's become a way of life. Anyone who has cooked for me knows to only serve me about half of what they serve themselves, or basically, a portion you'd give a 6-year-old child. I adore food. But I only want what I can finish.
What I like is for all courses to be served at once, so I can free-float through the different courses; bite of salad, taste of soup, nibble of dessert, bite of entree. I don't have to miss any for being too full.
Aside from breakfasts, the times I have been able to do this in a restaurant is exactly zero. I don't even ask -- I've waited tables and know how this would fuck things up for the kitchen, and I refuse to be the asshole eccentric customer. But I used to do it all the time in the college cafeteria.
Fellow Student: "Why are you alternating bites of jambalya and banana creme pie?"
Mare: "Cuz it rocks!"
The reason is that I fill up pretty quickly. Too quickly to still be interested in more food after I've finished the soup and salad. Add an appetizer to that, and you can just forget it. I'll be unable to do more than taste one bite of the most important part of the meal -- entree and dessert.
Also I think course-by-course encourages overeating, particularly with ginormous American portions and short mealtimes, because people feel obligated to continue eating even after they're stuffed, to get to "the good part." I've kept my weight in check all these years with portion control. No, I don't weigh food or measure, but I can eyeball something and know whether it's all going to fit inside or not. It's become a way of life. Anyone who has cooked for me knows to only serve me about half of what they serve themselves, or basically, a portion you'd give a 6-year-old child. I adore food. But I only want what I can finish.
What I like is for all courses to be served at once, so I can free-float through the different courses; bite of salad, taste of soup, nibble of dessert, bite of entree. I don't have to miss any for being too full.
Aside from breakfasts, the times I have been able to do this in a restaurant is exactly zero. I don't even ask -- I've waited tables and know how this would fuck things up for the kitchen, and I refuse to be the asshole eccentric customer. But I used to do it all the time in the college cafeteria.
Fellow Student: "Why are you alternating bites of jambalya and banana creme pie?"
Mare: "Cuz it rocks!"